Wallet investigations

Dig deep into any wallet and token: first entry, buy and sell pattern, what it holds now, where its funding came from, and where the tokens went. One ask, one written answer.

When a token nukes and you want to know who did it, the answer is spread across ten explorer tabs: when the wallet first bought, how it traded, what it still holds, who funded it before the buy, and where the tokens went afterwards. Vision assembles all of that in one ask and writes it up as a single investigation, with the evidence card underneath. How to ask Give it the wallet and the token. Paste the token's contract address when you have it.

An address is the token's identity, and plenty of different tokens trade under the same ticker. Dig deep into this wallet: AbCd…1234 — the token is EfGh…5678. Where did its funding come from and how much does it hold now? Trace this wallet's origin. Who is behind the selling? Investigate AbCd…1234 for $TOKEN. When did it first buy and where did the tokens go? How much does this cluster have left? What one investigation covers First entry: when and how the wallet first acquired the token.

A launch-pool buy, a swap, or tokens sent in from another wallet, with the date and size. The pattern: buys against sells, plus token transfers in and out. A wallet with a hundred buys and three sells is accumulating or distributing, and the shape of that is usually the finding. What it holds now: the live balance of the token you named, plus the wallet's overall value, read at the moment you ask. Funding origin: the earliest money into the wallet before the entry.

Who funded it, how much, and one hop further up: who funded the funder. Where the tokens went: the wallets that received the token from this one, ranked. This is where connected sell wallets show up. Keep digging The investigation names every wallet it finds with its full address. Tap any of them to copy it, and say "keep digging" or "trace that funder next" to follow the trail. Vision carries the addresses forward itself, so you never have to paste one back in.

What it will and won't claim Repeated counterparties and shared funders are on-chain patterns, and Vision reports them as exactly that. A wallet address alone cannot identify a person, and Vision will say so rather than turn a funding link into a claim about who owns what. Where a figure is approximate, like transfer values priced at current prices, it says that too. Heavy asks finish, then offer more.

A first-time scan of a busy wallet takes up to a minute, and results are cached so follow-ups are fast. If you ask about a whole cluster at once, Vision answers with what it has and offers the next wallet as a follow-up rather than making you wait on everything.